Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 1600X outperforms Xeon E5-2690 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 1600X is 1318 days newer than Xeon E5-2690 v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2690 v2
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 1600X - 20 vs 12 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 1600X
- Performs up to 4% better in Fortnite than Xeon E5-2690 v2 - 222 vs 214 FPS
- Consumes up to 27% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2690 v2 - 95 vs 130 Watts
Fortnite
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
FPS
222
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.8/FPS
100%
Price, £
£178.58
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £178.58 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 44020 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Single-Core
583
51.91451469278717%
Multi-Core
4085
85.71128829206882%
Intel Xeon E5-2690 v2 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 1600X |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 11th, 2017 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Summit Ridge |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 6 |
20 | Threads | 12 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |