Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900K outperforms Xeon E5-2687W on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900K is 2977 days newer than Xeon E5-2687W.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900K
- Performs up to 39% better in Starfield than Xeon E5-2687W - 64 vs 46 FPS
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2687W - 125 vs 150 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2687W - 20 vs 16 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2687W doesn't have integrated graphics
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2687W | vs | Intel Core i9-10900K |
---|---|---|
Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 10 |
16 | Threads | 20 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
150 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |