Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900K outperforms Xeon E5-2687W v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900K is 2941 days newer than Xeon E5-2687W v3.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900K
- Performs up to 27% better in Sea of Thieves than Xeon E5-2687W v3 - 283 vs 223 FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2687W v3 - 125 vs 160 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2687W v3 - 32 vs 20 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2687W v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Sea of Thieves
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
283
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.6/FPS
100%
Price, £
£454.02
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £454.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10358 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2687W v3 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900K |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Haswell-E/EP | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 24 |
20 | Threads | 32 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
160 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |