Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900X outperforms Xeon E5-2687W v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900X is 1867 days newer than Xeon E5-2687W v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2687W v3
- Consumes up to 3% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900X - 160 vs 165 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900X
- Performs up to 8% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Xeon E5-2687W v3 - 134 vs 124 FPS
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Buy for £565 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 65397 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Single-Core
1030
65.35532994923858%
Multi-Core
6832
72.90577312986875%
Intel Xeon E5-2687W v3 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900X |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2019 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i9 Extreme |
Haswell-E/EP | Codename | Cascade Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 10 |
20 | Threads | 20 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
160 W | TDP | 165 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |