Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 3900X outperforms Xeon E5-2687W v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 3900X is 2135 days newer than Xeon E5-2687W v2.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3900X
- Performs up to 5% better in Tom Clancy’s The Division 2 than Xeon E5-2687W v2 - 236 vs 225 FPS
- Consumes up to 30% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2687W v2 - 105 vs 150 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2687W v2 - 24 vs 16 threads
Tom Clancy’s The Division 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2687W v2 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 3900X |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 12 |
16 | Threads | 24 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
150 W | TDP | 105 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |