Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2683 v3 outperforms Pentium Gold G5400 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2683 v3 is 1302 days older than Pentium Gold G5400.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2683 v3
- Performs up to 2% better in Need For Speed Unbound than Pentium Gold G5400 - 131 vs 128 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium Gold G5400 - 28 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Pentium Gold G5400
- Consumes up to 52% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2683 v3 - 58 vs 120 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2683 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Need For Speed Unbound
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5-2683 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Pentium Gold G5400
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Pentium Gold G5400
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
Single-Core
731
83.63844393592677%
Multi-Core
1504
24.176177463430317%
Intel Xeon E5-2683 v3 | vs | Intel Pentium Gold G5400 |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 2nd, 2018 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Pentium Gold |
| Haswell | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
14 | Cores | 2 |
28 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| 3.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 120 W | TDP | 58 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 20.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
