Key Differences
In short — Core i3-12100 outperforms Xeon E5-2683 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-12100 is 2675 days newer than Xeon E5-2683 v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2683 v3
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-12100 - 28 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-12100
- Performs up to 8% better in ARK: Survival Evolved than Xeon E5-2683 v3 - 129 vs 119 FPS
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2683 v3 - 60 vs 120 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2683 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
ARK: Survival Evolved
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
129
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.88/FPS
100%
Price, £
£113.79
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £113.79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 118 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2683 v3 | vs | Intel Core i3-12100 |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Haswell | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
14 | Cores | 4 |
28 | Threads | 8 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
3.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
120 W | TDP | 60 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 |
No | Overclockable | No |