Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700F outperforms Xeon E5-2680 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-13700F is 3956 days newer than Xeon E5-2680.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-13700F
- Performs up to 27% better in Battlefield IV than Xeon E5-2680 - 476 vs 374 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2680 - 24 vs 16 threads
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5-2680
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Core i7-13700F
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2680 | vs | Intel Core i7-13700F |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 8 | Cores | 16 |
| 16 | Threads | 24 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
| 3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
| 130 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
