Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10105 outperforms Xeon E5-2680 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-10105 is 3297 days newer than Xeon E5-2680.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2680
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10105 - 16 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105
- Performs up to 8% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Xeon E5-2680 - 168 vs 155 FPS
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2680 - 65 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2680 doesn't have integrated graphics
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
168
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.51/FPS
100%
Price, £
£84.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £84.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 199 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2680 | vs | Intel Core i3-10105 |
---|---|---|
Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |