Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900X outperforms Xeon E5-2680 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-9900X is 1502 days newer than Xeon E5-2680 v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3
- Consumes up to 27% less energy than Intel Core i9-9900X - 120 vs 165 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900X
- Performs up to 7% better in Lost Ark than Xeon E5-2680 v3 - 260 vs 242 FPS
Lost Ark
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Xeon E5-2680 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Core i9-9900X
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 | vs | Intel Core i9-9900X |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i9 |
| Haswell | Codename | Skylake |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 10 |
24 | Threads | 20 |
| 2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| 3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
120 W | TDP | 165 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 25.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
