Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 3600XT outperforms Xeon E5-2678 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2678 v3
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT - 24 vs 12 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT
- Performs up to 10% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Xeon E5-2678 v3 - 137 vs 124 FPS
- Consumes up to 21% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2678 v3 - 95 vs 120 Watts
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Xeon E5-2678 v3
Server/Workstation
Ryzen 5 3600XT
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2678 v3 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
| Haswell-E/EP | Codename | Matisse |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 6 |
24 | Threads | 12 |
| 2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
| 120 W | TDP | 95 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
| 25.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
