Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 3600XT outperforms Xeon E5-2673 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 3600XT is 1763 days newer than Xeon E5-2673 v3.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT
- Performs up to 10% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Xeon E5-2673 v3 - 172 vs 157 FPS
- Consumes up to 10% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2673 v3 - 95 vs 105 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2673 v3 - 12 vs 4 threads
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Xeon E5-2673 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Ryzen 5 3600XT
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-2673 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Single-Core
712
41.78403755868544%
Multi-Core
1527
21.143727499307673%
Intel Xeon E5-2673 v3 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
| Haswell-E/EP | Codename | Matisse |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 6 |
| 4 | Threads | 12 |
| 2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| 3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
| 105 W | TDP | 95 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
| 24.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
