Key Differences
In short — Core i7-9700F outperforms Xeon E5-2670 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-9700F is 1688 days newer than Xeon E5-2670 v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-9700F - 24 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700F
- Performs up to 1% better in Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands than Xeon E5-2670 v3 - 190 vs 189 FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3 - 65 vs 120 Watts
Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
190
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.82/FPS
100%
Price, £
£346
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £346 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 321 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3 | vs | Intel Core i7-9700F |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Gainestown, Haswell-E/EP, Sandy Bridge-EP/EX | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 8 |
24 | Threads | 8 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
3.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
120 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |