Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2667 outperforms Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2667 is 272 days older than Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2667
- Performs up to 1% better in Saints Row than Celeron G1610 - 147 vs 145 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 12 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Consumes up to 58% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2667 - 55 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2667 doesn't have integrated graphics
Saints Row
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
145
98%
Value, £/FPS
£0.04/FPS
100%
Price, £
£5.56
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £5.56 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10476 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2667 | vs | Intel Celeron G1610 |
---|---|---|
Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Celeron |
Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 2 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
130 W | TDP | 55 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
No | Overclockable | No |