Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 5700X3D outperforms Xeon E5-2667 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 5700X3D is 4325 days newer than Xeon E5-2667.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D
- Performs up to 9% better in World of Tanks than Xeon E5-2667 - 551 vs 506 FPS
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2667 - 105 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2667 - 16 vs 12 threads
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
551
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.43/FPS
100%
Price, £
£239.56
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £239.56 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 222 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2667 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D |
---|---|---|
Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Not Available |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 16 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 105 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |