Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 1300X outperforms Xeon E5-2667 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 3 1300X is 1969 days newer than Xeon E5-2667.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2667
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 1300X - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 1300X
- Performs up to 6% better in Elden Ring than Xeon E5-2667 - 118 vs 111 FPS
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2667 - 65 vs 130 Watts
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2667 | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 1300X |
---|---|---|
Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Jul 27th, 2017 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Summit Ridge |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |