Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2670 v3 outperforms Xeon E5-2660 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2670 v3 is 916 days newer than Xeon E5-2660.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2660
- Consumes up to 21% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3 - 95 vs 120 Watts
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3
- Performs up to 6% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Xeon E5-2660 - 122 vs 115 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2660 - 24 vs 16 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2660 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3 |
---|---|---|
Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Gainestown, Haswell-E/EP, Sandy Bridge-EP/EX |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Server | Segment | Server |
8 | Cores | 12 |
16 | Threads | 24 |
2.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.3 GHz |
3.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 120 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
22.0x | Multiplier | 23.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |