Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900K outperforms Xeon E5-2660 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900K is 3313 days newer than Xeon E5-2660 v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2660 v2
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900K - 95 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900K
- Performs up to 51% better in World of Warcraft than Xeon E5-2660 v2 - 235 vs 156 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2660 v2 - 32 vs 20 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2660 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
235
100%
Value, £/FPS
£2.01/FPS
100%
Price, £
£471.74
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £471.74 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 40 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2660 v2 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900K |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 24 |
20 | Threads | 32 |
2.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
3.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |