Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X3D outperforms Xeon E5-2650 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X3D is 3956 days newer than Xeon E5-2650.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2650
- Consumes up to 21% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D - 95 vs 120 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D
- Performs up to 41% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Xeon E5-2650 - 161 vs 114 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2650 - 32 vs 16 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2650 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
161
100%
Value, £/FPS
£7.33/FPS
100%
Price, £
£1179.89
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £1,179.89 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 129 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2650 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
---|---|---|
Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 16 |
16 | Threads | 32 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
2.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.7 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 120 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |