Buy on Amazon
£59.97
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — FX-4350 outperforms Xeon E5-2650 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-4350 is 419 days newer than Xeon E5-2650.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2650
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than AMD FX-4350 - 95 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4350 - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-4350
- Performs up to 0% better in Overwatch 2 than Xeon E5-2650 - 319 vs 318 FPS
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
FX-4350
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
FPS
319
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.19/FPS
100%
Price, £
£59.97
100%
FPS and Value Winner
AMD FX-4350 4-Core Processor (125W, AM3+, 12MB Cache, 4300MHz)
Buy for £59.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 141 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Xeon E5-2650
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
FX-4350
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2650 | vs | AMD FX-4350 |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | FX |
| Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Vishera |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
| 2.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 125 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 19.5x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
