Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900K outperforms Xeon E5-2650 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900K is 2061 days newer than Xeon E5-2650 v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900K - 105 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900K
- Performs up to 8% better in DOOM Eternal than Xeon E5-2650 v3 - 503 vs 467 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
DOOM Eternal
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Nightmare
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Nightmare
Xeon E5-2650 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Core i9-10900K
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900K |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i9 |
| Haswell | Codename | Comet Lake |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 10 | Cores | 10 |
| 20 | Threads | 20 |
| 2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| 3.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
105 W | TDP | 125 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 23.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
