Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11400 outperforms Xeon E5-2650 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-11400 is 2753 days newer than Xeon E5-2650 v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2650 v2
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-11400 - 16 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400
- Performs up to 22% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Xeon E5-2650 v2 - 141 vs 116 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2650 v2 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2650 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
141
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.92/FPS
100%
Price, £
£130
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £130 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18319 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2650 v2 | vs | Intel Core i5-11400 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
16 | Threads | 12 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 |
No | Overclockable | No |