Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7900X3D outperforms Xeon E5-2650 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 7900X3D is 3412 days newer than Xeon E5-2650 v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2650 v2
- Consumes up to 21% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D - 95 vs 120 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D
- Performs up to 30% better in Remnant II than Xeon E5-2650 v2 - 103 vs 79 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2650 v2 - 24 vs 16 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2650 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Remnant II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
103
100%
Value, £/FPS
£3.73/FPS
100%
Price, £
£384.49
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £384.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2365 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2650 v2 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 12 |
16 | Threads | 24 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 120 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 44.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |