Buy on Amazon
£325
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms Xeon E5-2640 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 2977 days newer than Xeon E5-2640.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 7% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Xeon E5-2640 - 180 vs 169 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2640 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2640 - 20 vs 12 threads
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Core i9-10900F
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
180
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.81/FPS
100%
Price, £
£325
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Core i9-10900F Desktop Processor 10 Cores up to 5.2 GHz Without Processor Graphics LGA 1200 (Intel 400 Series chipset) 65W
Buy for £325 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 58229 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Xeon E5-2640
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Core i9-10900F
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-2640
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Single-Core
442
26.37231503579952%
Multi-Core
2284
27.106574887253736%
Intel Xeon E5-2640 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900F |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i9 |
| Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Comet Lake |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 6 | Cores | 10 |
| 12 | Threads | 20 |
| 2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| 3.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
| 95 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 25.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.