Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 1600 outperforms Xeon E5-2640 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 1600 is 1862 days newer than Xeon E5-2640.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 1600
- Performs up to 2% better in Monster Hunter: World than Xeon E5-2640 - 254 vs 250 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2640 - 65 vs 95 Watts
Monster Hunter: World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Xeon E5-2640
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Ryzen 5 1600
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2640 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 1600 |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 11th, 2017 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
| Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Summit Ridge |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 6 | Cores | 6 |
| 12 | Threads | 12 |
| 2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| 3.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| 95 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 25.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
