Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9920X outperforms Xeon E5-2640 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-9920X is 1502 days newer than Xeon E5-2640 v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2640 v3
- Consumes up to 45% less energy than Intel Core i9-9920X - 90 vs 165 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9920X
- Performs up to 6% better in World of Warcraft than Xeon E5-2640 v3 - 184 vs 173 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2640 v3 - 24 vs 16 threads
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Xeon E5-2640 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Core i9-9920X
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2640 v3 | vs | Intel Core i9-9920X |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i9 |
| Haswell-E/EP, Sandy Bridge-EP/EX | Codename | Skylake |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 8 | Cores | 12 |
| 16 | Threads | 24 |
| 2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| 3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
90 W | TDP | 165 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 26.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
