Key Differences
In short — Core i5-9600KF outperforms Xeon E5-2640 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-9600KF is 1583 days newer than Xeon E5-2640 v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2640 v3
- Consumes up to 5% less energy than Intel Core i5-9600KF - 90 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-9600KF - 16 vs 6 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9600KF
- Performs up to 9% better in Need For Speed Unbound than Xeon E5-2640 v3 - 146 vs 134 FPS
Need For Speed Unbound
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
146
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.16/FPS
100%
Price, £
£168.88
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £168.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14249 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2640 v3 | vs | Intel Core i5-9600KF |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Haswell-E/EP, Sandy Bridge-EP/EX | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
16 | Threads | 6 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
90 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |