Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2640 v3 outperforms FX-8320 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2640 v3 is 685 days newer than FX-8320.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2640 v3
- Performs up to 4% better in Rocket League than FX-8320 - 698 vs 673 FPS
- Consumes up to 28% less energy than AMD FX-8320 - 90 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8320 - 16 vs 8 threads
Rocket League
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Xeon E5-2640 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
FX-8320
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2640 v3 | vs | AMD FX-8320 |
|---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | FX |
| Haswell-E/EP, Sandy Bridge-EP/EX | Codename | Vishera |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 8 | Cores | 8 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| 3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
90 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 17.5x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
