Key Differences
In short — Core i5-4460 outperforms Xeon E5-2640 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-4460 is 252 days newer than Xeon E5-2640 v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2640 v2
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4460 - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4460
- Performs up to 11% better in Lost Ark than Xeon E5-2640 v2 - 244 vs 220 FPS
- Consumes up to 12% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2640 v2 - 84 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2640 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Lost Ark
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Xeon E5-2640 v2
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Core i5-4460
Desktop • May 11th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-2640 v2
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Single-Core
386
36.726926736441484%
Multi-Core
2325
79.40573770491804%
Intel Xeon E5-2640 v2 | vs | Intel Core i5-4460 |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | May 11th, 2014 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| 2.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
| 95 W | TDP | 84 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 20.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
