Buy on Amazon
Out of Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10300 outperforms Xeon E5-2640 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-10300 is 2433 days newer than Xeon E5-2640 v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2640 v2
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10300 - 16 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10300
- Performs up to 8% better in The Last of Us Part I than Xeon E5-2640 v2 - 137 vs 127 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2640 v2 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2640 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Intel® Core™ i3-10300 Desktop Processor 4 Cores up to 4.4 GHz LGA1200 (Intel® 400 Series chipset) 65W
Currently N/A on Amazon
Out of Stock
Updated 65820 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5-2640 v2
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Core i3-10300
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-2640 v2
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Single-Core
386
24.664536741214057%
Multi-Core
2325
48.488008342022944%
Intel Xeon E5-2640 v2 | vs | Intel Core i3-10300 |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i3 |
| Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Comet Lake |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| 2.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
| 95 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 20.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.