Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700F outperforms Xeon E5-2637 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-10700F is 2061 days newer than Xeon E5-2637 v3.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700F
- Performs up to 1% better in Control than Xeon E5-2637 v3 - 203 vs 201 FPS
- Consumes up to 52% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2637 v3 - 65 vs 135 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2637 v3 - 16 vs 8 threads
Control
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
203
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.05/FPS
100%
Price, £
£214.12
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £214.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 58180 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Single-Core
1127
69.91315136476427%
Multi-Core
4210
58.22154612086848%
Intel Xeon E5-2637 v3 | vs | Intel Core i7-10700F |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Haswell | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
135 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |