Key Differences
In short — Core i7-8700T outperforms Xeon E5-2630L v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-8700T is 1302 days newer than Xeon E5-2630L v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2630L v3
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-8700T - 16 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-8700T
- Performs up to 3% better in ARK: Survival Evolved than Xeon E5-2630L v3 - 122 vs 119 FPS
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2630L v3 - 35 vs 55 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2630L v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
ARK: Survival Evolved
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2630L v3 | vs | Intel Core i7-8700T |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 2nd, 2018 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Haswell | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
16 | Threads | 12 |
1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
2.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 35 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |