Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 3970X outperforms Xeon E5-2630L v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 3970X is 1904 days newer than Xeon E5-2630L v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2630L v3
- Consumes up to 80% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X - 55 vs 280 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
- Performs up to 10% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Xeon E5-2630L v3 - 134 vs 122 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2630L v3 - 64 vs 16 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
FPS
134
100%
Value, £/FPS
£13.43/FPS
100%
Price, £
£1800
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £1,800 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10254 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2630L v3 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Nov 25th, 2019 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Haswell | Codename | Castle Peak |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket TRX4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 32 |
16 | Threads | 64 |
1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
2.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 280 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |