Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 2200G outperforms Xeon E5-2630L v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 3 2200G is 1625 days newer than Xeon E5-2630L v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2630L v2
- Consumes up to 8% less energy than AMD Ryzen 3 2200G - 60 vs 65 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 2200G - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 2200G
- Performs up to 4% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Xeon E5-2630L v2 - 198 vs 190 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2630L v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Xeon E5-2630L v2
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Ryzen 3 2200G
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2630L v2 | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 2200G |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Feb 12th, 2018 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
| Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Raven Ridge |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| 2.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
60 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 24.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
