Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 3300X outperforms Xeon E5-2630 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 3 3300X is 2971 days newer than Xeon E5-2630.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3300X
- Performs up to 34% better in Rust than Xeon E5-2630 - 207 vs 154 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2630 - 65 vs 95 Watts
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
FPS
207
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.09/FPS
100%
Price, £
£225
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £225 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 79 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2630 | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 3300X |
---|---|---|
Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 24th, 2020 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
2.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |