Buy on Amazon
£235
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $667
Availability
MSRP in USD: $667
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700K outperforms Xeon E5-2630 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-10700K is 2061 days newer than Xeon E5-2630 v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i7-10700K - 85 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700K
- Performs up to 11% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Xeon E5-2630 v3 - 137 vs 123 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Core i7-10700K
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
137
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.72/FPS
100%
Price, £
£235
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Core i7-10700K
Buy for £235 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14611 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Xeon E5-2630 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Core i7-10700K
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3 | vs | Intel Core i7-10700K |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Haswell | Codename | Comet Lake |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 8 | Cores | 8 |
| 16 | Threads | 16 |
| 2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| 3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
85 W | TDP | 125 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 24.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
