Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2630 v3 outperforms Core i5-3330 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2630 v3 is 735 days newer than Core i5-3330.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3
- Performs up to 2% better in Stray than Core i5-3330 - 180 vs 177 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3330 - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3330
- Consumes up to 9% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3 - 77 vs 85 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Stray
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
177
98.33333333333333%
Value, £/FPS
£0.34/FPS
100%
Price, £
£59.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £59.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 58459 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
555
58.979808714133895%
Multi-Core
1643
32.60567572931137%
Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3 | vs | Intel Core i5-3330 |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Haswell | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
85 W | TDP | 77 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
No | Overclockable | No |