Key Differences
In short — Core i7-9700K outperforms Xeon E5-2620 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-9700K is 1874 days newer than Xeon E5-2620 v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2620 v2
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than Intel Core i7-9700K - 80 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700K
- Performs up to 24% better in World of Warcraft than Xeon E5-2620 v2 - 191 vs 154 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2620 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Xeon E5-2620 v2
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Core i7-9700K
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2620 v2 | vs | Intel Core i7-9700K |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| 2.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 95 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 21.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
