Key Differences
In short — FX-8150 outperforms Xeon E5-2620 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-8150 is 690 days older than Xeon E5-2620 v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2620 v2
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than AMD FX-8150 - 80 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of AMD FX-8150
- Performs up to 1% better in New World than Xeon E5-2620 v2 - 98 vs 97 FPS
New World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Xeon E5-2620 v2
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
FX-8150
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-2620 v2
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Single-Core
416
95.41284403669725%
Multi-Core
2118
100%
Intel Xeon E5-2620 v2 | vs | AMD FX-8150 |
|---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | FX |
| Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Zambezi |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| 2.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 18.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
