Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900K outperforms Xeon E5-2609 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900K is 2061 days newer than Xeon E5-2609 v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2609 v3
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900K - 85 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900K
- Performs up to 16% better in Resident Evil 4 than Xeon E5-2609 v3 - 185 vs 159 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2609 v3 - 20 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2609 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Resident Evil 4
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Xeon E5-2609 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Core i9-10900K
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-2609 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Single-Core
569
32.532875929102346%
Multi-Core
2519
27.490996398559425%
Intel Xeon E5-2609 v3 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900K |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i9 |
| Haswell-E/EP, Sandy Bridge-EP/EX | Codename | Comet Lake |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 6 | Cores | 10 |
| 6 | Threads | 20 |
| 1.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
85 W | TDP | 125 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 19.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
