Key Differences
In short — Core i7-9700K outperforms Xeon E5-2609 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-9700K is 1502 days newer than Xeon E5-2609 v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2609 v3
- Consumes up to 11% less energy than Intel Core i7-9700K - 85 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700K
- Performs up to 12% better in Borderlands 3 than Xeon E5-2609 v3 - 225 vs 200 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2609 v3 - 8 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2609 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Borderlands 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Badass
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Badass
Xeon E5-2609 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Core i7-9700K
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2609 v3 | vs | Intel Core i7-9700K |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Haswell-E/EP, Sandy Bridge-EP/EX | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 6 | Cores | 8 |
| 6 | Threads | 8 |
| 1.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
85 W | TDP | 95 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 19.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
