Key Differences
In short — Core i3-13100 outperforms Xeon E5-2609 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-13100 is 3040 days newer than Xeon E5-2609 v3.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-13100
- Performs up to 10% better in Battlefield 1 than Xeon E5-2609 v3 - 254 vs 231 FPS
- Consumes up to 29% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2609 v3 - 60 vs 85 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2609 v3 - 8 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2609 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
254
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.53/FPS
100%
Price, £
£133.97
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £133.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10680 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2609 v3 | vs | Intel Core i3-13100 |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Haswell-E/EP, Sandy Bridge-EP/EX | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
6 | Threads | 8 |
1.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
85 W | TDP | 60 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 |
No | Overclockable | No |