Buy on Amazon
£59.75
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $306
Availability
MSRP in USD: $306
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $42
Availability
MSRP in USD: $42
Key Differences
In short — Celeron G4900 outperforms Xeon E5-2609 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G4900 is 1303 days newer than Xeon E5-2609 v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2609 v3
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 6 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Performs up to 1% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Xeon E5-2609 v3 - 120 vs 119 FPS
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2609 v3 - 54 vs 85 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2609 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Intel Celeron G4900 Processor 3.1 GHz 2 MB Smart Cache Box
Buy for £59.75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 65463 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5-2609 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Celeron G4900
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-2609 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Single-Core
569
92.37012987012987%
Multi-Core
2519
100%
Intel Xeon E5-2609 v3 | vs | Intel Celeron G4900 |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2018 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Celeron |
| Haswell-E/EP, Sandy Bridge-EP/EX | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
6 | Threads | 2 |
| 1.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 85 W | TDP | 54 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 19.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.