Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 1600 outperforms Xeon E5-2609 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 1600 is 946 days newer than Xeon E5-2609 v3.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 1600
- Performs up to 7% better in Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Xeon E5-2609 v3 - 126 vs 118 FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2609 v3 - 65 vs 85 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2609 v3 - 12 vs 6 threads
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Xeon E5-2609 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Ryzen 5 1600
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2609 v3 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 1600 |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 11th, 2017 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
| Haswell-E/EP, Sandy Bridge-EP/EX | Codename | Summit Ridge |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 6 | Cores | 6 |
| 6 | Threads | 12 |
| 1.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| 85 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 19.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
