Key Differences
In short — Core i7-3770S outperforms Xeon E5-2420 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-3770S is 15 days older than Xeon E5-2420.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3770S
- Performs up to 4% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Xeon E5-2420 - 118 vs 113 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2420 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2420 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Xeon E5-2420
Server/Workstation • May 14th, 2012
Core i7-3770S
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2420 | vs | Intel Core i7-3770S |
|---|---|---|
May 14th, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2012 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Sandy Bridge-EN | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 1356 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
| 1.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
| 2.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
| 95 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 19.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4000 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
