Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10300 outperforms Xeon E5-2420 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-10300 is 2908 days newer than Xeon E5-2420.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10300
- Performs up to 16% better in Battlefield 2042 than Xeon E5-2420 - 165 vs 142 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2420 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2420 doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield 2042
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
165
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.91/FPS
100%
Price, £
£150.9
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £150.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • May 14th, 2012
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2420 | vs | Intel Core i3-10300 |
---|---|---|
May 14th, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Sandy Bridge-EN | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1356 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
1.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
2.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |