Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-1680 v4 outperforms Pentium G3258 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-1680 v4 is 749 days newer than Pentium G3258.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1680 v4
- Performs up to 9% better in Alan Wake 2 than Pentium G3258 - 110 vs 101 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G3258 - 16 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Pentium G3258
- Consumes up to 62% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1680 v4 - 53 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1680 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Alan Wake 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Xeon E5-1680 v4
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Pentium G3258
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Pentium G3258
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2014
Single-Core
613
49.9185667752443%
Multi-Core
1074
15.342857142857143%
Intel Xeon E5-1680 v4 | vs | Intel Pentium G3258 |
|---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Jun 2nd, 2014 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Pentium |
| Broadwell | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 2 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| 4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 140 W | TDP | 53 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
