Buy on Amazon
£77.99
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $1113
Availability
MSRP in USD: $1113
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-1660 v4 outperforms Core i7-2700K on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-1660 v4 is 1701 days newer than Core i7-2700K.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1660 v4
- Performs up to 6% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i7-2700K - 128 vs 121 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-2700K - 16 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2700K
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1660 v4 - 95 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1660 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Intel Core I7-2700K I7 2700K 3.5 GHz Quad-Core CPU Processor 8M 95W LGA 1155
Buy for £77.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 65394 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5-1660 v4
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Core i7-2700K
Desktop • Oct 24th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-2700K
Desktop • Oct 24th, 2011
Single-Core
664
56.60699062233589%
Multi-Core
2264
33.66042224204579%
Intel Xeon E5-1660 v4 | vs | Intel Core i7-2700K |
|---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Oct 24th, 2011 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Broadwell | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
| 3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| 3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
| 140 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
| 32.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 3000 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
