Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-1660 v4 outperforms Ryzen 3 2200G on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-1660 v4 is 602 days older than Ryzen 3 2200G.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1660 v4
- Performs up to 1% better in Dead Space than Ryzen 3 2200G - 150 vs 148 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 2200G - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 2200G
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1660 v4 - 65 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1660 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5-1660 v4
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Ryzen 3 2200G
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen 3 2200G
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
Single-Core
997
84.99573742540495%
Multi-Core
2858
42.49182277728219%
Intel Xeon E5-1660 v4 | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 2200G |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Feb 12th, 2018 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
| Broadwell | Codename | Raven Ridge |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
| 3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| 140 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 32.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
