Key Differences
In short — Pentium Gold G6405 outperforms Xeon E5-1660 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Pentium Gold G6405 is 2744 days newer than Xeon E5-1660 v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1660 v2
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium Gold G6405 - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Pentium Gold G6405
- Performs up to 3% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Xeon E5-1660 v2 - 121 vs 118 FPS
- Consumes up to 55% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1660 v2 - 58 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1660 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
121
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.54/FPS
100%
Price, £
£65.16
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £65.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7417 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Server/Workstation • Sep 10th, 2013
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1660 v2 | vs | Intel Pentium Gold G6405 |
---|---|---|
Sep 10th, 2013 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Pentium Gold |
Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
130 W | TDP | 58 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 41.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |